The Expanse: Series Review
The Expanse is a sci-fi TV series
that used to air on the ScyFy channel before it started being streamed on
Amazon Prime. A total of 5 seasons and with the 6th season likely to
be the last of the series, it is one of those shows that I would recommend watching.
Adapted from the series of science fiction novels James S. A. Corey, the joint
pen name of authors Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck, the show has its highs in
terms of the story and complexity. Its lows exist in the latest season which I
didn’t find too appealing and have some issues with as well as a few characters
I was unhappy with. The show has some scope to improve before its final hurrah
but overall, the show is watchable and fun to enjoy.
Story
The story begins in a futuristic
world wherein Earth has expanded its reach and humans have colonised the Moon
as well as Mars and are further expanding into other planets and moons. Mars
has its own independent government and military while Earth is under the
control of the United Nations (UN). Now let’s be honest here, the United
Nations is an organization that can never become its own government for
multiple reasons. I highly doubt any single country or even continent would
like to come under the rule of one organization even if it could be
democratically achieved. But for the sake of the story, let’s just go along
with it. The humans who are born in the Asteroid Belt or the Moons of the outer
planets are referred to as Belters who work for corporations mining asteroids,
farming on the moons and supplying Earth as well as Mars with resources that
are obtained by the Belters.
The Belters who have been
mistreated and oppressed by Earth and Mars have organized their own faction
called the Outer Planet Alliance (OPA) that are constantly resisting the powers
of both the planets. The series begins with a set of events wherein the Belters
have not been getting their fair ration of vital supplies. This in turn
triggers a set of events that has further boiled the tensions between Earth and
Mars as well as the Belters joining the OPA who have their own agendas and
plans for both planets.
It’s the complexity of the story
that makes the show unique compared to other sci-fi series that are currently
available such as The 100, Lost in Space, Altered Carbon and Westworld among
others. While the pilot episode of the show isn’t far too appealing and could
mislead the viewers into a false sense of disbelief, the rest of show does pick
up the pace and builds it towards the story it intended to present. Among all
the sci-fi shows I have watched so far, The Expanse is the only show that I felt
captures the complexity of human lives aptly. Whether it is about how wars
begin on misleading information, how alien technology or materials could still
be used for upmanship instead of destroying it and despite an impending
apocalypse or ill fate, divisions amongst humans can still exist. The show
captures these intricacies beautifully and balances the narrative along with
character build-up at least in the first 4 seasons of the show.
Cinematography and editing
The first season of the show has
a dark and gritty look to it, but the CGI is still on point and doesn’t feel
out of place throughout all the seasons. The sci-fi element of the show is
brought out well and it also uplifts the story telling as well as the acting.
But from the second season onwards, the show does shift to more brighter
colours and I believe the gritty look of the show wouldn’t have appealed to a
lot of audiences. But then again, it does not hamper the narrative in any
manner. I also appreciate the sound as well as video editing that was done as
it brought an in-depth look into the characters as well as help build the
suspense for the show.
In Season 4, the show also transitions from cinematic look to full screen from time to time but it doesn't feel jarring to the eyes at any point of time like how Michael Bay did for the last Transformer movie. There is a reason for doing that and if noticed more observantly, viewers will also understand the reasoning behind it.
Appealing points
The appeal of the show for many viewers as well as me would lie in the story that The Expanse presents. As mentioned earlier, it’s the complexity of human lives that is captured in the show. Although it has been adapted from a novel series, most shows aren’t able to easily present it on-screen. One of my favourite characters of the show was Amos Burton who is portrayed by Wes Chatham. His backstory and past were one of the stories I was looking forward to the most, but it wasn’t shown clearly or justified in the 5th season. His presence on-screen also overshadowed the main protagonists like James Holden (portrayed by Steven Strait), Naomi Nagata (portrayed by Dominique Tipper) and Alex Kamal (portrayed by Cas Anvar). One of the best seasons of the show would be the 3rd season wherein the build-up from the first 2 seasons on what the story could lead to finally shows its true colours in the 3rd season. I also felt that the first 3 seasons were the only ones where there is no mid-season lull present in it and every episode is providing better view and clarity on the direction of the next.
Unappealing
This is where I would give a spoiler alert warning as there are certain aspects of the show that I didn’t like including the story for the 5th season. If you would like to have a spoiler free viewing experience, you could skip reading this and go watch the show for yourself as well (smiles and chuckles).
As mentioned earlier, the pilot
episode of the show can very easily mislead viewers and audiences about the
show and drive away potential fans. Besides this, I didn’t like how Detective
Josephus Miller (portrayed by Thomas Jane) was written. Although I understood how
Jane wanted to act, it made me want to skip some of the scenes where his
character was present. But his role was written better and acted out well in
the follow-up seasons of the show. Even James Holden’s character wasn’t
entertaining enough in the first few episodes but evolves as the show
progresses.
Amos Burton’s backstory and past was something I was looking forward to and felt that it would be shown in the 5th season. But, as the show progressed, I was disappointed that the creators didn’t give a complete clarity on his past and left it vague for the viewers. The reason for my disappointment also stems from the fact that the main protagonists like James Holden, Naomi Nagata and Alex Kamal were given a fair presentation about their past. There were even supporting characters whose backstories were made abundantly clear. It is thereby surprising for me that the writers decided to keep Amos’ past a mystery.
Another factor of the show that I
didn’t like were the mid-season lulls in the story that I could clearly see in
the 4th and 5th season of the show. Although the writers
wanted to show some character growth and different aspects of the protagonists,
it didn’t contribute much towards the progress of the story (which was achieved
in the first 3 seasons) and I felt that is where the show lost its balance as
well.
For the 5th season,
one of the main storylines which was continued from the 4th season’s
ending was how a rogue faction of the OPA launches asteroids towards Earth
using stolen technology from Mars. While I understand that this was adapted
from the novels, there is an inherent flaw to this logic.
Firstly, it was clearly portrayed
since the first season of the show that Earth and Mars had stealth technology
as well as the counter measures in place against such advancements. It was even
made abundantly clear in the first 2 seasons of the show that there were rogue
elements from Earth who were trying to start a war between both planets. In my
opinion, any military for that matter would have considered an outcome wherein
stealth technology could be used to launch asteroids by either planet. In fact,
both planets had defense systems against asteroids in place thus the build-up
for the 5th season and the story that plays out post that would be
moot. The creators should have at least explained why the stealth tech could
have possibly overcome these defense measures instead of taking the
conventional route that no one would have thought about such a scenario.
What can be done better?
One of the things that the showrunners need to avoid is the misbalance between character growth and progress of the story narrative. They would need to revisit the first 3 seasons of the show wherein this was achieved. It would help in keeping the pace of the story going smoothly as I felt in the 4th and 5th season, the narrative almost came to a grinding halt just to build the characters. While the 6th season would likely be the final one for the show, the creators need to introspect on what factors about the book could be avoided or changed given by how the 5th season’s storyline has turned out. But at the same time, I would recommend the creators of the show to not skip the novel narrative and they should leave an open-ended finale for the show as the final book is the original novel series is yet to be published. After all, we know how the Game of Thrones final season turned out to be.
Comments
Post a Comment